$5,000+
GST Refunds Recovered across 5 amended BAS returns
$10,000
Journal Error Reversed incorrectly reported BAS liability
400+
Missing Transactions
identified and correctly entered
-
INDUSTRY:
Steel Manufacturing -
ISSUE:
Unreconciled books, missing transactions, and significant GST errors -
OUTCOME:
$15,000+ recovered, clean records, and full financial visibility restored
The Situation
The combination of the unreconciled bank accounts, the missing transactions, and the unreversed journal entry meant this business had been unknowingly overpaying its tax obligations for an extended period. None of this was intentional — it was the result of records not being maintained by someone with the training to catch these issues as they arose.
When this Melbourne-based steel manufacturer first decided to use our bookkeeping services, their financial records were in a state that made it impossible to rely on any of the data they contained. The business had been using the owner’s wife to manage the bookkeeping (a common arrangement for small and medium-sized businesses) but without formal bookkeeping training or experience with the accounting software in use, the records had accumulated significant errors and omissions over an extended period.
The consequences were serious. The bank accounts had never been reconciled, BAS returns had been lodged on incomplete data, a significant journal error had gone undetected, superannuation was being paid without any formal reconciliation process, and payroll had not been properly reconciled for over a year. The business owner had no reliable profit and loss statement and therefore no accurate understanding of how their business was actually performing financially.
What We Found
1. Bank accounts had never been reconciled
The most fundamental issue was that the bank reconciliation had simply never been performed. For a company structure, as opposed to a sole trader, accurate and regular bank reconciliation is not a matter of preference; it is a basic requirement of sound financial management and a prerequisite for preparing any reliable financial statement or tax return.
After requesting all bank statements from the client, we identified a missing bank feed — an entire account that was not connected to the accounting software and had therefore never had its transactions imported. This meant that a portion of the business’s actual financial activity was entirely absent from the records.
2. Over 400 transactions were missing
Once the missing bank feed was identified and the full set of statements obtained, we began the process of importing and reconciling every outstanding transaction. In total, more than 400 transactions had never been entered into the accounting system. These were real business transactions, payments to suppliers, receipts from customers, and operating expenses, that had simply been omitted from the records entirely.
Every one of these missing transactions had flow-on effects. They distorted the income and expense figures, they affected the GST position reported on each BAS return, and they made the business’s apparent financial performance meaningfully different from its actual performance.
3. BAS Returns had been lodged with incomplete data
The business’s tax agent had been preparing and lodging BAS returns throughout this period — but doing so without complete transaction data, and without a reconciled bank account to validate the figures being reported. This is a significant problem. A BAS return prepared on incomplete records will almost certainly report the wrong GST position, and any GST refunds to which the business was legitimately entitled would not have been claimed.
Once we had completed the data entry and reconciliation for the affected periods, we were able to quantify exactly how much had been missed. The result was over $5,000 in additional GST refunds across five BAS return periods, money that belonged to the business but had never been claimed because the underlying records were incomplete when the returns were lodged.
4. A $100,000 journal entry was artificially inflating income
During our review of the general ledger, we identified a journal entry for $100,000 that had been posted by the tax agent to increase the business’s reported income. Journal entries of this nature are sometimes used to support loan applications, where a lender requires a business to demonstrate a certain income level. While this may have served a purpose at the time it was entered, it had never been reversed.
The practical effect of leaving this entry in place was that it had been included in the GST-applicable income figures on subsequent BAS returns, directly increasing the GST payable by $10,000. This was not a genuine GST liability — it arose entirely from an artificial accounting entry that should have been removed once its purpose had been served. We reversed the journal entry and applied for the appropriate correction, recovering a further $10,000 for the client.
5. Superannuation was being paid without any reconciliation
The business was paying superannuation to its contractors, but the payments were being made on an ad hoc basis without any supporting payslips, without a formal reconciliation process, and without a consistent schedule. This created a situation where it was impossible to verify whether the correct amounts had been paid, whether any contractors had been underpaid or overpaid, or whether the business’s superannuation obligations were being met in a manner that would satisfy ATO scrutiny.
We implemented a proper superannuation reconciliation framework, moved the business to a weekly payslip cycle for its contractors, and established a process for paying and recording superannuation contributions on a weekly basis. This brings the business into line with standard payroll practice and ensures that its superannuation obligations are transparent, accurate, and defensible.
6. Payroll had not been reconciled for more than a year
The payroll account had not been formally reconciled for more than twelve months. This created a compounding set of discrepancies — incorrect entries had accumulated over the period, and the payroll figures in the system did not accurately reflect what had actually been paid. Identifying and correcting these entries required a systematic review of all payroll transactions across the unreconciled period, cross-referencing them against bank records and employee or contractor payment histories.
Once this work was completed, the payroll account was reconciled accurately for the first time in over a year, and the business had a reliable record of its actual payroll obligations and payments.
The result that we delivered
With all transactions correctly entered, all accounts properly reconciled, the journal error reversed, and the payroll records cleaned up, we were able to produce something the business had not previously had: a reliable, accurate profit and loss statement.
For the first time, the business owner could see exactly how their company was performing, their actual revenue, their real cost of goods, their operating expenses, and their true net profit. This is the fundamental purpose of a set of accounts, and it is something this business had been operating without for an extended period.
Issue Identified | Resolution & Outcome |
Bank accounts never reconciled; missing bank feed identified | All statements obtained, missing feed connected, full reconciliation completed |
400+ transactions missing from accounting system | All transactions entered, coded, and reconciled accurately |
BAS returns lodged on incomplete data across 5 periods | $5,000+ in additional GST refunds recovered through amended returns |
$100,000 journal entry inflating income and BAS payable | Journal reversed; $10,000 in incorrect GST liability removed |
Superannuation paid without reconciliation or payslips | Weekly payslip system implemented; super reconciliation framework established |
Payroll unreconciled for over 12 months | All incorrect entries identified and corrected; payroll account fully reconciled |
No reliable profit and loss statement available | Accurate P&L produced for the first time; full financial visibility restored |
Why is using a bookkeeper important?
The total financial recovery for this client exceeded $15,000. The bookkeeping fees required to achieve that outcome were a fraction of that figure. Beyond the dollar value, the client gained something that cannot be easily quantified: the confidence of knowing that their financial records are accurate, their compliance obligations are being met, and their business decisions are based on reliable data. |
This case is not unusual. Across small and medium-sized businesses in Australia, it is common for bookkeeping to be managed by a family member or the business owner themselves — often out of a desire to keep costs down or to maintain control over financial information. In many cases, this arrangement works adequately when the business is small and transactions are simple.
As a business grows in complexity, however, the risk of errors accumulating quietly in the background increases significantly. The steel manufacturer in this case was not a poorly run business — it was a profitable operation whose financial records had simply not kept pace with its complexity. The owner had no reason to suspect that over $15,000 in recoverable funds was sitting in incorrectly lodged BAS returns and an unreversed journal entry, because nothing in the day-to-day operation of the business indicated that anything was wrong.
This is precisely the risk of unreconciled books. The problems are not visible until someone with the training to look for them actually does so.
Key takeaways for a business owner
If your business is in a similar situation — or if you are unsure whether your books are being maintained to the standard required — the following points are worth considering:
- Bank reconciliation is not optional for a company structure. If your bank has not been reconciled regularly, your financial data cannot be relied upon for any purpose.
- BAS returns prepared on incomplete records create GST errors that cost you money. Amended returns can often recover those funds, but only if the underlying records are corrected first.
- Journal entries made for specific purposes — such as loan applications — must be reversed once that purpose has been served. An unreversed journal can distort income figures and inflate tax liabilities indefinitely.
- Superannuation paid without a reconciliation framework creates compliance risk. The ATO takes superannuation obligations seriously, and the consequences of underpayment extend beyond the amount owed.
- Payroll reconciliation should be performed regularly, not annually or never. Errors in payroll accumulate quickly and become progressively harder to unwind the longer they are left unaddressed.
- A reliable profit and loss statement is a management tool, not just a compliance document. Without one, business decisions are made on instinct rather than evidence.
Is Your Business in a Similar Position?
If you are concerned about the accuracy of your current bookkeeping, have unreconciled accounts, or simply are not sure whether your financial records are in the condition they should be, we offer a free initial consultation.
We will assess your current situation honestly and give you a clear picture of what needs to be done.
